Translate

Tuesday, October 15, 2013

Hello, Modernity !

Ewa Sułek
Hello, Modernity!



Exhibition in the Wroclaw’s City Gallery is the first and so varied overview of Julia Curyło’s works. It consists of cycles LHC, Gods particle, Collisions, Meetings and individual works of various subjects, all nonetheless inspired by the present — that, which surrounds, which forms and influences a XXI Century human — and brimming with humor and irony, presented in a surprising, accurate, graceful and light manner. In all of Curyło’s works, regardless of their individual subject matter, we will find a few sources of her fascination. She was always interested in the schemata behind the forming of moral order and ethical rules through cult aesthetics. Her first works show remissive figures of saints amongst inflated dolphins, lambs or soap bubbles. Through her big-format, very detailed canvas she analysed the attitude of 21st Century human to faith, mysticism and religion. She was especially fascinated by the problem of faith’s commercialization, the issue of pop-culture being present in religion and tied to it aesthetic of kitsch and tawdry spectacles. Figures of saints are answers to the search for God, His material equivalents. The modern human, “homo modernus”, thinks in images — thus the need to materialize the god and the saints, and to search for tangible evidence of their existence. From the first cycle of works Curyło naturally moves to the next series of paintings devoted to LHC, the Large Hadron Collider, which is used by CERN scientists to look for the God’s element in human world. Four paintings from that big-format series can be seen at the exhibition in Wrocław — LHC Genesis, LHC Judgement, LHC Cathedral and LHC Love.
 In preparation for these painting Curyło visited the Genevan CERN (the European Organization for Nuclear Research) where works are undergoing on what is the likely biggest experiment in the world’s history. It is in these picturesque surroundings of the lake Como that the largest machine on earth was created - the Large Hadron Collider — LHC, an accelerator, that is the construction accelerating the matter particles. From 2008 LHC collides two opposing particle beams of protons with collision energy of 14 TeV and constituting only a half of maximal power. The scientists hope that with collisions achieved using the doubled energies they will be able to distinguish the Higgs boson, denoted as H0. This hypothetical elementary particle was supposed to exist for approximately 10 miliseconds after the Big Bang and is thought to have brought all matter into existence. This is why it is called by some the God’s particle. It is because of it that other elementary parts of matter could gain mass. Scientists from CERN think that Higgs particles fulfil a key role in the universe. Their discovery could give an answer to a question that has been riddling humanity for centuries: how was the world came to be? Constructors of the collider and the supporters of the experiment are looking for a rational explanation to the mystery of matter’s existence. They do not find any satisfaction in the explanations provided by faith, which repeatedly postulate the existence of a higher being, the creator and demiurge, the maker of Universe (creationism is an element in three out of five largest world religions, the monotheistic religions — Judaism, Christianity and Islam). This conflict regarding the theory of creation carries with it many other issues — including the question of how will our perception of world change, if scientists prove the existence of hypothetical H0 particle? Curyło is not interested in the answer to that question — she is fascinated by the search itself and the great challenge that a human undertakes when dealing with the mystery of universe. The questions Paul Gauguin asked himself over hundred years ago in the famous painting Where Do We Come From? What Are We? Where Are We Going? haven’t sincredible civilisational development and modern technologies. CERN’s experiment one on hand reflects the man of science who, using the tools available to him, tries to rationalize and explain that, which was so far based on faith. On the other hand it reveals the human being as inferior to the power of creation and nature, trying to uncover its mysteries and to get closer to the unknown. Curyło’s paintings abound with symbols and allegories showing  different aspects of the search. Directing our attention to the methods of Aby Warburg and Erwin Panafosky, I would like to take a closer look at the four paintings by Curyło which were selected for the exhibition in the City Gallery.
LHC Genesis stands for a kind of fantasy about the world’s creation. The painting could easily illustrate the Hexameron displayed in the initial chapters of Genesis, if it wasn’t for the massive machinery set up at its centre. It covers the prelapsarian landscape, illustrating the original state of happiness and symbiosis in the garden of Eden. Animals, earth and sky coexist in ideal harmony, the idyllic atmosphere is underlined by the soap bubble floating in the air. The idyll is eclipsed by the gigantic creation, the LHC construct, which is the creator of all being in Curyło’s painting. The contrast between nature and mechanics is made even stronger by putting it in a frame made out of cables. In Paradise there are no humans — it is the primal, harmonious state of nature, before any interference from humans, which also places it alongside the more widely explored issues of dehumanism in art, removal of the load from the mankind’s back as the centre of universe.
LHC Love is a question about new life. God, in Christian understanding, is the maker and the giver of life. In Curyło’s work an iron construction takes His place — clearly visible is the intercourse between colliders, which resemble the female and male reproductive systems. It is the mechanical fertilization, as a result of which a new element emerges — maybe it is the antimatter, maybe the pre-particle or H0 particle. On this canvas appear the elements characteristic of her earlier pieces — the irregular, resemblant of soap-bubbles shapes. In Curyło’s works they symbolize creation, the crystallization of the new. From them emerge the little people — the figures of men and women, symbolizing the biblical Adam and Eve, emerging to the shore. However these are not humans made out of flesh and bones but Japanese dolls Dollfie, that can get makeup, have their features changed, be individually assembled and have their history remade from the scratch. Dollfie are zanot
children’s toys, their owners are adults constituting a very specific subculture, restricted to blogs and internet forums. Every doll is very expensive and represents a real work of art. Collectors change their hair colour, dress or even sex. Playing with these dolls is like imitating reality, creating of a parallel world filled with beautiful, mysterious beings — playing a God.
LHC Judgement refers to the classical in Christian art depiction of the Judgement Day which has the figure of Christ the Judge at its centre, who is punishing but also just and merciful, and places to his sides figures of the redeemed and the damned. The complex machine that constitutes the painting’s focal point on one side spreads destruction, on the other — gives hope and life. By alluding to the traditional catholic iconography, Curyło once again emphasized the connection between her earlier cycle devoted to pop-religion and the LHC cycle.
In LHC Cathedral one can see the great hall where the hadron collider is constructed. The shape of the room resembles a Gothic cathedral. The religious ties are also hinted at by doves and two figures of the Virgin and Child. They resemble objects present in the earlier canvases by Curyło. The statuettes of the Virgin seem to be made of pink plastic, like those that can be bought on Sundays fairs and filled with water. Doves look like the balloons that appeared in large numbers on such paintings as Lambs of God, Jesus, the Good Shepherd Above the Academy of Fine Arts in Warsaw Or The Temptation of Anthony on Dolphins. The Large Hadron Collider is here in place of God and the whole scene is a symbolic tribute to science and reason. However, the artificial doves and plastic Madonna make us doubt whether the fetishisation of rationalism is not idolatry in the likeness of the one that Curyło presented in her earlier works.
In visionary and deeply symbolical paintings dominates the LHC — The Large Hadron Collider. Its form — circle — represents another another layer of meanings that we can find in these works.
“Everything that is done by the world’s power happens in a cricle. Sky is circular, [...] earth is round like a ball and so are all the stars. Wind in its greatest blows spins. Birds wind round nests. [...] Sun comes up and falls round and round, just like the moon. Even the seasons make the giant rounds in their changes and always return to where they once were. The human life is a circle from childhood to childhood.”
Shape of the machine evokes manadala — it consists of abstract elements that form a regular and closed whole. Mandala, in sanscrit an ambit, circle, appears very frequently in the traditional art of Hindu and Buddhism where it has strong spiritual and ritual meaning. It is believed that the creation of mandala has calming and healing properties. Up to this day Tibetan monks form it out of sand during meditation. Yet we can find mandala in Christianity as well — in the form of rose window, Celtic cross, aureole, oculus or crown of thorns. The motif appears in the illuminated books of Hildergarda of Bingen, a visionary and mystic living in 12th century and in the gnostic practices, i.a. Rosicrucians. Its complex symbolic is most commonly read as an ideal organizational structure of life — a cosmic diagram reminding us about the connections between our lives and eternity and about the world, that is present simultaneously in our bodies and minds and outside of them. According to Carl Jung mandala is the centre of everything — it expresses the essence, the infinitude and the extremity. The structure of circle, which is also the structure of LHC, is in itself perfect and constituting a perfect whole — just like the God in the monotheistic religions. The series of Curyło’s paintings raises the problem of modern god — for some it is science, for other religion. The artist connected the theory of creation which originates in faith and world’s end with the scientific search, picturing a difficult to verbalize problem of the contemporaries — the struggle of rationalism and desire to learn truth against the fidelity towards tradition and faith. The mandala motif is explored by Curyło in another series of canvas or rather objects, Gods particle, which consist of canvases with mandalas and constructs built into them. The motif of mandala and the symbolic related to it dominate each of the works. At its centre are the squares symbolizing that which is earthly and tangible.The kinds of readymades symbolize various faiths and religions, these are the devotional articles hidden behind the glasses in the manner of rosaries and wooden sculptures of saints as well as the village shrines. They allude too to the childish play of “secrets” where, buried underground behind glass, were various “treasures”, that, which is the most valuable to us and of great significance. In a similar manner glass blocks are being built into canvases, so that we can take a peek at the “treasures”. Also for that purpose they are lit by a light-bulb installed into the painting. Square and mandala circle are a combination of the earthly with the divine. The artist explores then her initial preoccupation with the interpenetrating spheres of sacrum and profanum present in our lives also by referring to the search for the God particle and the collisions in the accelerator LHC. In formal terms Curyło was interested in the play with blackness and the combination of traditional oil painting on canvas with sculpture alongside the reference to the traditional arrangement — mounding ofmandalas out of various elements of tangible world.
The series of works devoted to the search of God’s particle is concluded by the cycle Collisions. Several paintings bring to mind a biological abstraction. In reality they comprise a true picture of physical phenomena — they represent moments of photon collisions, shown in an aesthetically
tasteful manner and pleasing to the senses. Series LHC on one side is a search, development, struggle against the nature and the matter alongside the always present with humans, and especially currently, the necessity of naming things, of their materialization, translation.
The current civilisation and its achievements towards a human as a natural being is a motif running through other works of Curyło such as Mother or Artificial Womb. Inspired by the biogenetic search, she addresses issues such as the nature vs technology and industry, the living organism vs the artificial one. Modern human is trapped in the complicated network of dependencies in the face of machines and new technologies that he himself creates. The theme of posthumanism, which is tied to the change in perception of mankind’s place in the world, is present in her works as well. The abandonment of anthropocentric point of view and of the conviction that mankind stops being the centre of the world and the measure of all things and that all the non-human lifeforms are no longer his subjects are the fundamental tenants of posthumanism. Curyło’s art however is not posthumanist, it only investigates the new relationships and problems that are being faced by the modern man — among others a search for one’s place in the world of new technologies. Curyło is also interested in the problems of modern art market, which is the subject of her piece Jeff Koons and Damien Hirst divide the art market. Koons, who in 2007 became the most expensive living artist (the piece Hanging Heart, Magenta, Gold was sold for 23.6 million dollars at an auction). This is not the only reason why he drew Curyło attention. In her early works she often invokes the aesthetics of kitsch and neo-pop in addition to the inflatable objects which are so close to the American artist, who once said in an interview for Chicago Magazine in the June of 2008 2: “the inflatables, of course, are metaphors for people, and they are metaphors of life and optimism for me. The most deathlike image I know is of an inflatable that has collapsed—I try not to keep them around”. Similarly in Curyło’s case — the inflatable animals and human figures in her pictures always cause, despite even the most serious subject matter, that the work appears as joke and elicits a smile from the observer, gains his sympathy. As Mirosław Jasiński writes: “Paintings by Julia Curyło play with borders between culture, knowledge and faith — they show contradictions, restrictions and absurdities against which an individual has a weapon–laughter”. 3 Such is, among other pieces, the Breakfast on the beach — it is a play on one of the best known paintings, the Breakfast on the grass by Edouard Manet. The modern version with inflatable figures which were so characteristic of Curyło’s early works is a light–hearted treatment of the topic of consumerism and going into raptures about material goods. Similarly mainly irony and merriment accompany the painting Jeff Koons and Damien Hirst divide the art market, despite the fact that the artist addresses in it the important problem of the functioning of modern art market. The two giants of art market — Jeff Koons and Damien Hirst are floating over water like Christ over the Lake of Gennesaret, the modern gods worshipped by crowds of flatterers. Just as in the traditional depictions of saints they are accompanied by their attributes, alluding to the best known works — the shark and the skull 4 in case of Hirst and the inflatable dolphin and the doll of Cicciolina 5 for Koons. The inflatable artefacts elevated to the ranks of art, the banal everyday objcts, additionally filled with air, became on the art market objects of great material value. Hirst and Koons are the mega stars of modern market — and in such somewhat ironic manner they are beign depicted by the artist. Heroes carried over the world on their artificial “steeds” — the inflatable dolphin and the shark out of formalin. Hirst’s work For the Love of God (a real human skull encrusted with diamonds) was sold in 2007 for 100 million dollars, becoming the most expensive artwork by a living
artist. Two years later it was discovered that it was bought by a holding company in which the artist himself participated. The object which was created as a jest, for money and as jibe at the centuries-old iconology of skull in art and the theme of vanitas, became one of the most important and most known artistic objects of our times and was exhibited in the most eminent museums in the world like London’s Tate Modern or Riijksmuseum in Amsterdam. 6 Mockery and absurd are what that work and works of Julia Curyło have in common, and so Hirst’s presence in her picture is not only a literal depiction of hero and god of modern art world in the context of art market’s rules of functioning, but rather a kind of wink at the artist himself, whose legacy is close to her in a way.
Another pair of heroes or gods of modernity are Steve Jobbs and Bill Gates shown in the picture A conversation between Steve Jobbs and Bill Gates, the second out of the still open series Meetings. Inspiration for this picture was provided by the book The Map and the Territory by Michael Houellebecq which describes a painting, which has Bill Gates and Steve Jobbs meet for an afternoon game of chess. The author treats this depiction of two visionaries as an allegory for the history of capitalism. In Curyło’s work Jobbs and Gates were placed in the middle of desert, where, just like Hirst and Koons, they appear in a form of modern saints equipped with their branded attributes.Incorporated were also the standard products of modernity — for instance the McDonald meal, which is an ironic treatment of consumption phenomena but also poses a question about modern form of spirituality. As Szymon Maliborski wrote on the occasion of Julia Curyło’s exhibition in Galeria Biała in Lublin: “Hence the desert, an immemorial place of mystical epiphanies appears in association with the aesthetics of mass production. Such combination and blending of traditions, the question about the devotionunderstood in a broader sense are the driving force behind many of Julia Curyło’s works”. 7
One could spend ages writing about each of Julia Curyło’s works. Their common denominator is precisely the modernity served in a light and humorous manner, accepted with all of its imperfections, with a smile and openness, as if the artist was welcoming it saying “Hello Modernity!”. Be it in a very universal dimension as is the case of LHC series and the search for the truth about where we come from, or in a more temporal way — as in Euroarabia where we will find references to the Femen movement, Oriana Fallacci and her criticism of Islam, the problems of coexistence and crossing cultures, global village and matters associated with feminism and questions about role and place of a woman in modern world. In all her works Curyło remains faithful to the symbolical realism, believing in strength and great sensuality of painting. The incredibly polished canvases to which she devotes long hours and physical work, represent a return to the essence of painting.



LHC, Genesis
 oil on canvas | 156×224 cm




LHC , Love
164×213 cm | 2011 | kolekcja prywatna





LHC, Cathedral
 oil on canvas | 204×153 cm |





Collision 11
oil on canvas 90 *120 cm





 God’s Particle (mandala 3)
                mixed technique (oil, gouache on canvas, glass, material, plastic, light) | 60×80 cm |




| God’s Particle (mandala 4)
    mixed technique (oil, gouache on canvas, glass, material, plastic, light) | 60×80 cm |




                                                               



Danse Macabre
                            mixed technique (oil on canvas and small crystals) | 140×210 cm



 

                                                                       Euroarabia
                                                          oil on canvas | 120×200 cm





Jeff Koons & Damien Hirst divide the art market
oil on canvas | 140×210 cm



                                     
                                       Conversation between Steve Jobs and Bill Gates 
                                                        oil on canvas | 140×210 cm



Last week I was opening my exhibition in Wrocław at Galeria Miejska. One of the parts of my "Hello, Modernity" exhibition was presented in the public space, a project called 'Feminist Hens', it was an installation with 17 ornamental hens - inflatable sculptures. The fragments of works shown in the Feministic Hens are citations, elements or interpretations of well-known female artists.The form of a hen was used in reference to the commonly used idiomatic phrase “kura domowa” [literally: domestic hen, a housewife] as a description of a woman, whose role comes down to taking care of the household and as a result of which often neglects her personal development. It is derogative term as it fits into the charge of parochialism, subjugation and becoming schematic. A domestic hen (bird) is a species that does not appear in natural environment — it was artificially created with an intention of being bred for eggs and meat. I tried, by applying to the Hens the imagery of “female” art, converts them into “ornamental hens” — marked by art. This amplifies the contrast between art — a symptom of high culture and “a domestic hen”, a role schematically applied to women, and directs attention to another matter — the stereotypical view of women’s art as ornamental, decorative, pretty and easy to understand, which is clearly contradicted by the fragments of the works — often unsettling, difficult and demanding in their reception.
Unfortunately 8 of Hens were stolen (and others destroyed) during the first night. The police were notified about the theft and after 2 days they found the culprits - two students. Still we don't know if it was just an act of vandalism or an organized operation.
You can see there a reportage about that !


http://fakty.tvn24.pl/ogladaj-online,60/komu-przeszkadza-sztuka-miasta,362463.html

Chicks; Julia Curyło’s inflatable sculptures liberated in urban space



Feminstic Hens
Ewa Sułek


Julia Curyło’s project Chicks aims at creating an installation comprised of dozens of pneumatic hens. Currently more than ten of them have been prepared. They soon will be joined by others. The project assumes an open form — a gallery of hens constantly expanded by adding new sculptures. The hens filled with air and covered with print depicting the most interesting phenomena of “women’s and feminist art” from Poland and around the world constitute a very modern and grotesque form of women’s painting exhibition. An exhibition in an outer space. Curyło owes her interest in hens to Leon Tarasewicz, who is a hen fancier and a breeder of ornamental chickens. Hens appeared for the first time in her project Hens — Polish Painters. It is a series of fourteen PCV objects. In each of them Curyło reproduces a characteristic motif appearing in the works of such Polish artists as Leon Tarasewicz, Wojciech Fangor and Roman Opałka, among others. These objects w ere shown, inter alia, at the Metro Centrum display in Warsaw and at Julia Curyło’s exhibitions in Cracow (Galeria Szara, 2011) and Legnica (Galeria Sztuki in Legnica, 2011). The exhibition in Legnica was accompanied by a grass-root initiative — an audience member placed next to the installation a plate reading “Free the Hens!”. Other inflatable PCV objects by Curyło were showcased in public space in Warsaw (Hoovera Square), Katowice (Euro- Centrum), Poznań (KontenerART and No Women No Art festivals) — we are talking here about the Tulips series. These sculptures were produced out of soft PCV and filled with air, which is not without a meaning. As inflatable objects they have the ability to fly, to float over the earth — so they contain a supernatural, magical element. On the other hand, the filled with air sculptures are empty inside. This emptiness, lightness, as well as the material they are made of, indicate their artificiality — by mocking real flowers they create unreality in reality. Curyło’s Tulips introduced a fantasy element into reality, gave it a new magical character. This work was also intended to prompt passers-by to look at the well-known to them place in a new context. Another work created in the urban space was the sculpture Chick. It was an intrusion into the structure of an already established object — the disliked by the citizens of Bydgoszcz Millennium of Polish State Monument sculpted by Stanisław Lejkowski, which can be found on Leszka Białego Square. This took place as part of the Urban Vision Quest Project, which aims to restore public interest to forgotten objects. The installation project Chick consists of an inflated ball placed on the top of the sculpture, with “limbs” coming out of it and filled inside with inflated elements of ambiguous shapes. It is covered with print that depicts folk motifs alongside representations from the realm of dreamy imagination, colourful and picturesque, joyful and unnerving at the same time. Creation of the project was significantly influenced by the aesthetics of the sculpture itself as well as the genesis of the statue by Stanisław Lejkowski. The three–legged composition, according to the author’s concept, is a symbolic nest, which was meant to be presided over by the eagle at the top (eagle that actually never appeared up there). Chick is a reference to the original eagle, only its embryonic form. It symbolizes the end of the old system (when the sculpture was created) and a birth of a new one, exposed to constant changes. The appearance of Chick (2010) on the square was widely commented and arouse the interest of Bydgoszcz citizens towards that forgotten object. The two incidents that happened to Curyło’s works can testify the impact that art can have in public space.
When exhibiting Tulips as part of the international festival KontenerART in Poznan in 2010, one of the tulips vanished. After a few days of searching the festival organizers re ceived an anonymous phone-call with hints where to find the object. This was broadcast by Polish media throughout the country. Even a bigger media sensation was the Curyło’s piece Lambs of God — a large format mural placed in the January of 2010 at the Marymont Metro station in Warsaw as part of the competition A19 and actions undertaken by gallery Pociąg do Sztuki [Drive for Art]. Soon after the mural was revealed, voices appeared claiming that the lambs shown are in fact inflatable sheep sold in sex shops. The Warsaw Metro company and the president of Warsaw, Hanna Gronkiewicz–Waltz received a series of letters asking for removal of the mural, which was said to be offensive to the religious feelings of tube passengers. Already in January the mural was vandalized — one of the passers-by wrote on it “trash not art”. In result the piece took on its own life, became an object of interference and audience participation. After this incident the mural was revitalized, however it was decided to have removed it earlier — fearing for possible controversies as Easter Holidays approached.
The most recent project of Julia Curyło, the Chicks mark her return to the motif of hens — the painters and paintresses. The choice the female artists and their works is subjective — these are figures and pieces significant to her in some way. Incredibly important is the mere visual form of the work — Curyło selected objects that communicated with her formally. The fragments of works shown in the Feministic Hens are citations, elements or interpretations. The artist alluded to the works of Artemisia Gentileschi, Mary Cassat, Suzanne Valadon, Louise Bourgeois, Sonia Delaunay, Frida Kahlo, Lee Krasner, Paula Modersohn–Becker, Georgia O’Keeffe, Niki de Saint Phalle, Marina Abramovic, Yoko Ono, Barbara Kruger, Jenny Holzer, Shirin Neshat, Alina Szapocznikow and Natalia LL. Most of the selected works discusses women and touches upon their problems (in case of Neshad it is the situation of women in Islamic societies, for Natalia LL — the objectification of female body; Gentileschi or Delaunay represent the rare cases of female artists who entered the historical canon of old art, while Cassat was placed in there as an example of an artist whose art is deemed as typically feminine — delicate, enjoyable and decorative). The form of a hen was used in reference to the commonly used idiomatic phrase “kura domowa” [literally: domestic hen, a housewife] as a description of a woman, whose role comes down to taking care of the household and as a result of which often neglects her personal development. It is derogative term as it fits into the charge of parochialism, subjugation and becoming schematic. A domestic hen (bird) is a species that does not appear in natural environment — it was artificially created with an intention of being bred for eggs and meat. Curyło, by applying to the Hens the imagery of “female” art, converts them into “ornamental hens” — marked by art. This amplifies the contrast between art — a symptom of high culture and “a domestic hen”, a role schematically applied to women, and directs attention to another matter — the stereotypical view of women’s art as ornamental, decorative, pretty and easy to understand, which is clearly contradicted by the fragments of the works — often unsettling, difficult and demanding in their reception. The painting by Artemisia Gentileschi does not differ anyhow from the works of painters active at that time and the cruelty displayed in it evidently contradicts the premise of female art being gentle, delicate and anodyne. Already in the 19th century the idea of popular, mass culture, was linked with works of women, at the time when art and culture understood as authentic, deep — was seen as men’s domain. 1 This was connected to the Nietzschean view of “a man the philosopher and the hero”, as well as the fears tied to the growing popularity of feminism. Men constructed a certain figure of masculinity to which intellect, vigour, continence and composure were the fundamental characteristics. This was done in the opposition to a female figure — a victim of consumerist life in material world which is driven by desire. Another 19th century construct is the ideology of separate spheres, according to which women are assigned to the private world of home and heart, while men belong to the public world of politics, business and culture. These ideologically constructed categories decidedly affected the assessment of works of women. The social system and educational potential pushed women to the wayside — the main reason being the limited access to education and thus the possibility of professional artistic work. The artistic professions were definitely dominated by men. Women’s painting was treated as a hobby and the profession of artist was deemed inappropriate for a woman. 2 A feminist art critic, Anna Chave mentions the notion according to which a female body was meant to be identified at that time with a surface of canvas or paper, a space accessible to a paintbrush or a pencil — a phallic instrument. 3 Both the nude and the act of watching the work were considered, according to Chave, as penetration. These theories would exclude not only female artists but also the female audience. In Julia Curyło’s project the “bodies” of hens really play with this crude theory — at the same time they constitute the symbol of a woman and of a female body and, on the other hand, the art created by women is being applied to them. The choice of the women artists is cross–sectional — hens were decorated with works of paintresses, sculptresses and video artists from different cultures and times. This amplifies the impression of women’s constant struggle for their place in the world and history created by men, and also shows the changes undergone precisely due to the work of the subsequent generations of women. However, by putting these works on the plastic inflatable hens, the meaning conveyed becomes less serious, more sarcastic. To speak of female or feminist art shows that the canons established by homocentric art history are still strong and to talk about women’s art as a separate category means participating in the game in which men write the rules. Hens were envisioned as a project in a city space. Hence the cross-section of the artists shown and the focus on the most famous names. The aim is to bring their art to a random observer, who would not have to visit deliberately a gallery or museum. The form of a hen is meant to fascinate the viewer and draw him nearer so that he can have a closer look at the object. The displaying of hens in an open space has also a symbolic meaning — of leaving the walls and the enclosed “domestic” space, which was meant as women’s domain. It is a symbolic space not only for art but also for the issues discussed by art — women’s issues. The works were selected from artists who in one way or another contributed to breaking conventions and responsibilities ascribed to them, and who were first to speak loudly and fearlessly about problems faced by women as well as about their bodies. Finally, the hens bear connotations not only with domestic hens. In English a small chicken — a chick — is a colloquial term used to describe an attractive girl, and used as such is objectifying. The Hen series is an endless play with context, stereotype and the observer, who discovers new stretches of meaning. The project was realized thanks to a grant from the Ministry of Culture and National Heritage. At the present the artist is looking for further funding to expand the gallery of her hens.





Natalia LL, Yoko Ono's and Jenny Holzer's Hens




                                             CHICKS: Artemisia (GENTILESCHI)- recto

                                                       Mary (CASSATT) -recto

                                                   Suzanne (VALADON) -recto

                                                        Sonia (DELAUNAY) - verso

                                              Paula (MODERSOHN- BECKER) - recto

                                              Natalia (GONCHAROVA) -verso

                                                  Méret (OPPENEHEIM) - recto

                                               Niki (de SAINT PHALLE) - verso

                                                       Alina (SZAPOCZNIKOW) - recto

                                                  Louise (BOURGEOIS) - verso

                                                       Jenny (HOLZER)- verso

                                                                Natalia (L.L) - verso

                                                       Cindy (SHERMAN) -recto

                                                   Marina (ABRAMOVIĆ) -verso

Tuesday, October 8, 2013


Nobel Prize in physics for Peter Higgs and Francois Englert for discovering the God's Particle!!!






LHC Atlas&Alice, oil on canvas


The matter of the so called 'God's Particle' (Higgs Boson) which you can discover in a series of my paintings (check it out HERE) was today officially appreciated by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences - read more HERE.


Saturday, October 5, 2013

  
                                New exhibition -"Hello, Modernity" -10.10 ! You are welcome !